A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving future neighbours more than the construction of a wall at a coastal web page in a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes captivated nationwide awareness following an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children residence at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of arranging breaches, environmental worries, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier and also the Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around construction operates at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, seek to create their loved ones residence. The situation happens to be emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of established people. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying built by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their website, resulting in an encroachment on a Unique Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are issue to strict controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological effects, especially inside a sensitive coastal atmosphere including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, and that is partially developed, is in the correct placement. Their legal team has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding so that you can preserve their view, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which has because become emblematic of your intensity from the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they have been meant to Get visual evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water for the duration of critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the positioning became The most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was staying encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being protected intimately because of the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read more submissions on no matter if interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant during the lawful timeline.
With the core on the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing paperwork, maps, and problems hooked up into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their motion is inspired by issue Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely for environmental protection and adherence to planning legislation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they may have explained their long-standing connection to the realm and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair simply just attempting to develop a relatives residence in accordance Along with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Exclusive Place of Conservation and say that each one works are actually completed depending on Skilled guidance and approved plans. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into the sea through a storm, will not change the underlying info.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above building of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a problem a large number of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved with community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from extremely different professional backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded through waist-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting each the Actual physical fact of your coastline along with the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court should establish if the wall as created complies with scheduling permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other extended following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition, it underscores how quickly a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties including environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. Whether it will eventually be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the court’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.